Determinising parity automata
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Parity word automata and their determinisation play an important role in automata and game theory. We discuss a determinisation procedure for nondeterministic parity automata through deterministic Rabin to deterministic parity automata. We prove that the intermediate determinisation to Rabin automata is optimal. We show that the resulting determinisation to parity automata is optimal up to a small constant. Moreover, the lower bound refers to the more liberal Streett acceptance. We thus show that determinisation to Streett would not lead to better bounds than determinisation to parity. As a side-result, this optimality extends to the determinisation of B"uchi automata.
Recommendations
Cited in
(16)- -automata
- Index appearance record with preorders
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1701356 (Why is no real title available?)
- Bounded Parikh automata
- Ramsey-based analysis of parity automata
- Parityizing Rabin and Streett
- Approximate automata for omega-regular languages
- Computing the Rabin Index of a Parity Automaton
- Good-for-MDPs automata for probabilistic analysis and reinforcement learning
- Rabin vs. Streett automata
- From Nondeterministic B\"uchi and Streett Automata to Deterministic Parity Automata
- Register-bounded synthesis
- A survey on satisfiability checking for the \(\mu \)-calculus through tree automata
- From Muller to parity and Rabin qutomata: optimal transformations preserving (history) determinism
- Complementation of Emerson-Lei automata
- Optimal transformations of games and automata using Muller conditions
This page was built for publication: Determinising parity automata
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2922042)