Discussion: a mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_9MaRDI QIDQ2971675zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Brian Skyrms

Publication date 7 April 2017

Published in Readings in Formal Epistemology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_9

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• Dutch books, coherence, and logical consistency
• The coherence argument against conditionalization
• Diachronic Dutch books and Sleeping Beauty
• The stubborn non-probabilist -- ``negation incoherence and a new way to block the Dutch book argument
• Coherence without additivity.

Cites work

• Conditionalization and observation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 52447 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3026923 (Why is no real title available?)
• Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games
• Sequential Equilibria
• Subjective probability: Criticisms, reflections, and problems

This page was built for publication: Discussion: a mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2971675)