Effectivity for existence of rational points is undecidable
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- An effort to prove that the existential theory of \(\mathbb Q\) is undecidable
- As easy as \(\mathbb {Q}\): Hilbert's tenth problem for subrings of the rationals and number fields
- Characterizing integers among rational numbers with a universal-existential formula
- Definability and decision problems in arithmetic
- Defining Z in Q
- Defining integrality at prime sets of high density in number fields.
- Diophantine definability and decidability in large subrings of totally real number fields and their totally complex extensions of degree 2
- Diophantine definability over some rings of algebraic numbers with infinite number of primes allowed in the denominator
- Finiteness theorems for abelian varieties over number fields.
- Hilbert’s Tenth Problem and Mazur’s Conjecture for large subrings of $\mathbb {Q}$
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1007358 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2247920 (Why is no real title available?)
- The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves
- The decision problem for exponential diophantine equations
- The Difference Between the Weil Height and the Canonical Height on Elliptic Curves
This page was built for publication: Effectivity for existence of rational points is undecidable
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6979233)