Excluding pairs of graphs
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: For a graph and a set of graphs , we say that is {em -free} if no induced subgraph of is isomorphic to a member of . Given an integer , a graph , and a set of graphs , we say that {em admits an -partition} if the vertex set of can be partitioned into subsets , so that for every , either , or the subgraph of induced by is -free for some . Our first result is the following. For every pair of graphs such that is the disjoint union of two graphs and , and the complement of is the disjoint union of two graphs and , there exists an integer such that every -free graph has an -partition. Using a similar idea we also give a short proof of one of the results of cite{heroes}. Our final result is a construction showing that if are graphs each with at least one edge, then for every pair of integers there exists a graph such that every -vertex induced subgraph of is -split, but does not admits an -partition.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(7)- Unavoidable tournaments
- Extending the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 475621 (Why is no real title available?)
- Splits with forbidden subgraphs
- Detours in directed graphs
- Polynomial bounds for chromatic number. VIII: Excluding a path and a complete multipartite graph
- Solving the \textsc{induced subgraph} problem in the randomized multiparty simultaneous messages model
This page was built for publication: Excluding pairs of graphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q402589)