Existential Definability over the Subword Ordering

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We study first-order logic (FO) over the structure consisting of finite words over some alphabet A, together with the (non-contiguous) subword ordering. In terms of decidability of quantifier alternation fragments, this logic is well-understood: If every word is available as a constant, then even the Sigma1 (i.e., existential) fragment is undecidable, already for binary alphabets A. However, up to now, little is known about the expressiveness of the quantifier alternation fragments: For example, the undecidability proof for the existential fragment relies on Diophantine equations and only shows that recursively enumerable languages over a singleton alphabet (and some auxiliary predicates) are definable. We show that if |A|ge3, then a relation is definable in the existential fragment over A with constants if and only if it is recursively enumerable. This implies characterizations for all fragments Sigmai: If |A|ge3, then a relation is definable in Sigmai if and only if it belongs to the i-th level of the arithmetical hierarchy. In addition, our result yields an analogous complete description of the Sigmai-fragments for ige2 of the pure logic, where the words of A∗ are not available as constants.





Cites work









This page was built for publication: Existential Definability over the Subword Ordering

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6178718)