Expected Significance Level as a Sensitivity Index for Test Statistics
From MaRDI portal
Cited in
(14)- The Neyman-Pearson theory as decision theory, and as inference theory; with a criticism of the Lindley-Savage argument for Bayesian theory
- Valid \(p\)-values and expectations of \(p\)-values revisited
- The p value line: a way to choose the tuning constant in tests based on the Huber M-estimator
- The minimaxity of the mid P-value under linear and squared loss functions
- A bivariate normal example where the locally most powerful and distantly most powerful test statistics are beaten everywhere from a median p-value standpoint
- Advantages of variance stabilization
- A Monte Carlo study of three odds ratio estimators and four tests of association in several 2x2 tables when the data are sparse
- Generalized p values and random p values when the alternative to uniformity is a mixture of a Beta(1,2) and uniform
- AN ADAPTIVE PROCEDURE FOR GOODNESS-OF-FIT BASED ON SAMPLE SPACINGS
- A new and intuitive test for zero modification
- Critique of p‐Values
- A comparison of normality testing methods by empirical power and distribution of P -values
- EDI-Graphic: A Tool To Study Parameter Discrimination and Confirm Identifiability in Black-Box Models, and to Select Data-Generating Machines
- Comparison of one-way ANOVA tests under unequal variances in terms of median p -values
This page was built for publication: Expected Significance Level as a Sensitivity Index for Test Statistics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5512556)
