Exploiting uncertainty and incomplete knowledge in deceptive argumentation

DOI10.1007/3-540-45545-0_114MaRDI QIDQ2779431zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Valeria Carofiglio, Fiorella de Rosis

Publication date 15 April 2002

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2073/20731019

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computing methodologies and applications (68U99)

Recommendations

• An interactive system for generating arguments in deceptive communication
• Dialectical argumentation for reasoning about chemical carcinogenicity
• Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
• Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
• On explanations for non-acceptable arguments

Cited in

(4)

• Deceit and indefeasible knowledge: the case of dubitatio
• Recent advances in computational models of natural argument
• An interactive system for generating arguments in deceptive communication
• Epistemic formulae, argument structures, and a narrative on identity and deception: a formal representation from the AJIT subproject within AURANGZEB

This page was built for publication: Exploiting uncertainty and incomplete knowledge in deceptive argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2779431)