Fixed point theorem of composition g-contraction mapping and its applications
The author formulates two theorems extending the classical Banach fixed point theorem. Unfortunately, the main results seem to be not correct. The assertion of Theorem 1 is not true without some additional assumptions. In particular consider the space \(M= \mathbb{R}\), the subsets \(X_1= [0,1]\), \(X_2= [1,2]\) and \(X_i= [2,3]\) for \(i= 3,4,\dots\) and the mappings \(T_i: X_i\to X_{i+1}\) defined as follows: \(T_1(x)= 1+{x\over 3}\) for \(x\in [0,1]\), \(T_2(x)= 2+{x\over 3}\) for \(x\in [1,2]\) and \(T_i(x)= 2+{x\over 3}\) for \(x\in [2,3]\), \(i= 3,4,\dots\); none of the mappings of the form \(T_i\circ T_{i-1}\circ\cdots\circ T_1\) \((i= 1,2,3,\dots)\) has a fixed point, while using Theorem 1 of the paper we should expect existence of the (unique) fixed point since all assumptions of that theorem are satisfied. There are several mistakes in the text (one of them seems to be really essential: the definition of \(P_j\) in Theorem 2 (formula (11)) is incorrect).
- The composition of two connected \(G_\delta\) functions has a fixed point
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3874199 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4065919 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 89456 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: Fixed point theorem of composition g-contraction mapping and its applications
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1596400)
