Fragility and strength

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANAD106MaRDI QIDQ6836206zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Teodor-Tiberiu Călinoiu, Daniele Bruno Garancini

Publication date 27 March 2026

Published in Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ANALYS/ANAD106

zbMATH Keywords

abductionfragility to paradoxliar sentenceslogical strength

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Cites work

• A fully classical truth theory characterized by substructural means
• A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics
• A paraconsistent route to semantic closure
• A propositional logic with subjunctive conditionals
• Connections between some notions of completeness of structural propositional calculi
• Connexive implication
• Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth
• From paraconsistent logic to dialetheic logic
• Lectures on inductive logic
• Outline of a Theory of Truth
• Paradox without Self-Reference
• Saving truth from paradox
• The logic of paradox
• The logics of strict-tolerant logic
• Varieties of logic
• What is a paraconsistent logic?
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Yablo's paradox

This page was built for publication: Fragility and strength

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6836206)