What logical pluralism cannot be
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(29)- Restall's proof-theoretic pluralism and relevance logic
- The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
- Counterlogicals as counterconventionals
- From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism
- A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics
- On when a disjunction is informative. Ambiguous connectives and a realist commitment to pluralism
- Metalogical pluralism and universal logic
- PLURALISM IN LOGIC
- Logical pluralism
- Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique
- Logical pluralism: another application for chunk and permeate
- Problems for logical pluralism
- Alethic pluralism and logical consequence
- Logical pluralism and logical form
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2236607 (Why is no real title available?)
- Some remarks on logical realism and logical pluralism
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7644103 (Why is no real title available?)
- Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
- Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism
- Logical pluralism without the normativity
- (Meta)inferential levels of entailment beyond the Tarskian paradigm
- Limiting logical pluralism
- Why logical pluralism?
- A dialogical route to logical pluralism
- Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse
- Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?
- Fragility and strength
- Formal schemas of induction as models
- Bridge principles and epistemic norms
This page was built for publication: What logical pluralism cannot be
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484956)
