The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1707192
DOI10.1007/S10670-016-9841-7zbMATH Open1384.03019OpenAlexW2521261169MaRDI QIDQ1707192FDOQ1707192
Authors: Colin R. Caret 
Publication date: 29 March 2018
Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9841-7
Recommendations
- What logical pluralism cannot be
- Logical pluralism without the normativity
- Limiting logical pluralism
- Beyond logical pluralism and logical monism
- Logical pluralism
- Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse
- Problems for logical pluralism
- A logic-based approach to pluralistic ignorance
- On the rationality of pluralistic ignorance
- PLURALISM IN LOGIC
Cites Work
- Saving truth from paradox
- Logical pluralism
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- One true logic?
- Doubt truth to be a liar
- Elusive knowledge
- PLURALISM IN LOGIC
- What logical pluralism cannot be
- Pluralism and proofs
- Structures and logics: a case for (a) relativism
- Problems for logical pluralism
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Foundations of logical consequence
- Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic
- Varieties of logic
Cited In (15)
- Beyond logical pluralism and logical monism
- Moderate anti-exceptionalism and earthborn logic
- Why classical logic is privileged: justification of logics based on translatability
- Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
- Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?
- Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism
- What logical pluralism cannot be
- Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique
- A dialogical route to logical pluralism
- Is logic distinctively normative?
- Against logical generalism
- Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse
- Meaning-preserving translations of non-classical logics into classical logic: between pluralism and monism
- Why logical pluralism?
- Problems for logical pluralism
This page was built for publication: The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1707192)
