The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated

DOI10.1007/S10670-016-9841-7zbMath1384.03019OpenAlexW2521261169MaRDI QIDQ1707192

Colin R. Caret

Publication date: 29 March 2018

Published in: Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9841-7

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (10)

Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction ⋮ Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism ⋮ Against logical generalism ⋮ Why logical pluralism? ⋮ A dialogical route to logical pluralism ⋮ Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse ⋮ Moderate anti-exceptionalism and earthborn logic ⋮ Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism? ⋮ Why classical logic is privileged: justification of logics based on translatability ⋮ Meaning-preserving translations of non-classical logics into classical logic: between pluralism and monism

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Pluralism and proofs
• Structures and logics: a case for (a) relativism
• One true logic?
• Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic
• Varieties of Logic
• Foundations of Logical Consequence
• Elusive Knowledge
• PLURALISM IN LOGIC
• Logical Pluralism
• Problems for Logical Pluralism

This page was built for publication: The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated