Why logical pluralism?

DOI10.1007/s11229-019-02132-wzbMath1525.03012OpenAlexW2915401906MaRDI QIDQ6088955

Colin R. Caret

Publication date: 14 December 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02132-w

zbMATH Keywords

consistencylogicentailmentproofpluralismrelativismcontextualism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (1)

Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Reassessing logical hylomorphism and the demarcation of logical constants
• The medieval theory of consequence
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Structures and logics: a case for (a) relativism
• Mathematical pluralism: The case of smooth infinitesimal analysis
• Logical constants and the glory of truth-conditional semantics
• One true logic?
• Logical form. Between logic and natural language
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic
• Foundations of Logical Consequence
• PLURALISM IN LOGIC
• Modal Logic as Metaphysics
• What are logical notions?
• Logical Pluralism
• Problems for Logical Pluralism
• Varieties of Logic
• Logicality and Invariance

This page was built for publication: Why logical pluralism?