Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

DOI10.1007/S11229-021-03348-5MaRDI QIDQ6180134zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robert Paßmann

Publication date 19 January 2024

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03348-5

zbMATH Keywords

coherencecontextualismlogical pluralismmeta-logiccorrect logicmeaning-variance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Beyond logical pluralism and logical monism
• Metalogical pluralism and universal logic
• Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1222503
• Varieties of logic

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3508455 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3557754 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3269024 (Why is no real title available?)
• An intuitiomstic completeness theorem for intuitionistic predicate logic
• Completeness and incompleteness for intuitionistic logic
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• Logical pluralism
• Logical predictivism
• Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism
• On some Kripke complete and Kripke incomplete intermediate predicate logics
• On the constructive Dedekind reals
• On the logic of demonstratives
• On weak completeness of intuitionistic predicate logic
• Problems for logical pluralism
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• Varieties of logic
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Why logical pluralism?

Cited in

(3)

• Is there a neutral metalanguage?
• An introduction to the special issue: logics and their interpretations. II
• Limiting logical pluralism

This page was built for publication: Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6180134)