Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

DOI10.1007/S11229-021-03348-5zbMATH Open1528.03054OpenAlexW3192528032MaRDI QIDQ6180134FDOQ6180134

Authors: Robert Paßmann 

Publication date: 19 January 2024

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03348-5

Recommendations

• Beyond logical pluralism and logical monism
• Metalogical pluralism and universal logic
• Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1222503
• Varieties of logic

zbMATH Keywords

coherencecontextualismlogical pluralismmeta-logiccorrect logicmeaning-variance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• On weak completeness of intuitionistic predicate logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Completeness and incompleteness for intuitionistic logic
• Logical pluralism
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• An intuitiomstic completeness theorem for intuitionistic predicate logic
• On the constructive Dedekind reals
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Problems for logical pluralism
• On the logic of demonstratives
• On some Kripke complete and Kripke incomplete intermediate predicate logics
• Logical predictivism
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• Varieties of logic
• Why logical pluralism?
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism

Cited In (3)

• Is there a neutral metalanguage?
• An introduction to the special issue: logics and their interpretations. II
• Limiting logical pluralism

This page was built for publication: Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6180134)