Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique

DOI10.1007/S10670-013-9478-8MaRDI QIDQ488376zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Manuel Bremer

Publication date 26 January 2015

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9478-8

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Problems for logical pluralism
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
• Logical pluralism
• Restall's proof-theoretic pluralism and relevance logic

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4051556 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 777478 (Why is no real title available?)
• Logical pluralism

Cited in

(7)

• Contra Cartwright: Structural realism, ontological pluralism and fundamentalism about laws
• Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction
• Metalinguistic negotiation and logical pluralism
• What logical pluralism cannot be
• Meaning-preserving translations of non-classical logics into classical logic: between pluralism and monism
• Restall's proof-theoretic pluralism and relevance logic
• Problems for logical pluralism

This page was built for publication: Restall and Beall on logical pluralism: a critique

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q488376)