Why logical pluralism?
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5285446 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1984009 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3291139 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3060434 (Why is no real title available?)
- Doubt truth to be a liar
- Formality in logic from logical terms to semantic constraints
- Foundations of logical consequence
- Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic
- Logical constants and the glory of truth-conditional semantics
- Logical form. Between logic and natural language
- Logical pluralism
- Logicality and Invariance
- Mathematical pluralism: The case of smooth infinitesimal analysis
- Modal Logic as Metaphysics
- One true logic?
- PLURALISM IN LOGIC
- Problems for logical pluralism
- Reassessing logical hylomorphism and the demarcation of logical constants
- Structures and logics: a case for (a) relativism
- The bounds of logic. A generalized viewpoint
- The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated
- The medieval theory of consequence
- Varieties of Logic
- What are logical notions?
- What logical pluralism cannot be
- Who's afraid of inconsistent mathematics?
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Why logical pluralism?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6088955)