Frege's permutation argument

DOI10.1305/NDJFL/1093636845MaRDI QIDQ1097250zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Andrew W. Moore, Andrew Rein

Publication date 1987

Published in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093636845

zbMATH Keywords

model theoretic reconstruction of Frege's permutation argument

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Review text

The paper concerns a technical argument adduced by Frege in section 10 of his Grundgesetze. Peter Schroeder-Heister has reconstructed this argument model-theoretically and argued that it does not establish its conclusion which is, in any case, false. We argue that this reconstruction goes awry. Frege's argument can be reconstructed model-theoretically, but in such a way that it appears as a perfectly sound demonstration of its conclusion.

Recommendations

• Frege's permutation argument revisited
• A model-theoretic reconstruction of Frege's permutation argument
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3895032
• A Version of the Frege - Quine Argument
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1324396

Cited in

(6)

• A model-theoretic reconstruction of Frege's permutation argument
• Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I \S\S 29-32
• Frege on referentiality and Julius Caesar in \textit{Grundgesetze} Section 10
• A Version of the Frege - Quine Argument
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3895032 (Why is no real title available?)
• Frege's permutation argument revisited

This page was built for publication: Frege's permutation argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1097250)