Heuristic solutions and confidence intervals for the multicovering problem
The authors are reporting on large scale computational studies for randomly generated multicover problems: min cx s.t. Ax\(\geq b\), \(x\in \{0,1\}\), \(b\in {\mathbb{N}}_+\). The comparison of ten (pure) heuristics and two mixed heuristics (ALL 10: randomly selecting heuristics from the basic 10 in each step; TOP 5: randomly selecting one of the best five in each individual problem) shows f.e. that a TOP 5-heuristic in about 70 \% of all studies yields a better solution than any pure heuristic. Under the assumption that ALL 10-solutions are (stochastically) independent and follow a Weibull distribution, a maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the distribution yields some narrow confidence intervals. The computational study suggests that the optimal solution will lie very likely in these intervals.
- An efficient heuristic for large set covering problems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3831680 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3639144 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3793772 (Why is no real title available?)
- Interval estimation of a global optimum for large combinatorial problems
- On the quality of heuristic solutions to a 19\(\times 19\) quadratic assignment problem
- Procedures for Estimating Optimal Solution Values for Large Combinatorial Problems
- Set covering algorithms using cutting planes, heuristics, and subgradient optimization: A computational study
- Using Confidence Limits for the Global Optimum in Combinatorial Optimization
This page was built for publication: Heuristic solutions and confidence intervals for the multicovering problem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q579132)