Ideal convergence generated by double summability methods

Ideal and statistical convergence (40A35) Multiple sequences and series (40B05) Matrix methods for summability (40C05) Summability methods using statistical convergence (40G15)

Review text

An admissible ideal \(I\) in \(\mathbb N\times \mathbb N\) is a collection of subsets of \(\mathbb N\times \mathbb N\) that does not contain \(\mathbb N\times \mathbb N\), contains the empty set, is closed under finite unions, and \(B\in{I}\) and \(A\subset{B}\) implies \(A\in{I}\). Similar to the technique used to generate densities via ordinary summability methods, given a nonnegative RH-regular method \(T\), one can define a density \( \mu_{T}\) by setting NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\mu_{T}(A)=\lim_{m,n} \sum \left\{t_{m,n,j,k}: (j,k)\in{A}\right\}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE for \(A\subset \mathbb N\times \mathbb N\) provided the limit exists. The author proves that if \(I\) is an ideal generated by a regular double summability matrix method \(T\), that is the product of two nonnegative regular matrix methods for single sequences, then \(I\)-statistical convergence and convergence in \(I\)-density are equivalent. He points out that the densities used to generate statistical convergence, lacunary statistical convergence, and general de la Vallée-Poussin statistical convergence are generated by these types of double summability methods, and if a matrix \(T\) generates a density with the additive property, then \(T\)-statistical convergence, convergence in \(T\)-density and strong \(T\)-summability are equivalent for bounded sequences. A counterexample is also given to show that not every regular double summability matrix generates a density with additive property for null sets.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(3)

This page was built for publication: Ideal convergence generated by double summability methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q253740)