Immunity and hyperimmunity for sets of minimal indices
Given an equivalence relation \(\equiv\) on c.e. sets of natural numbers, one may define a corresponding set of minimal indices \(\{\,e\mid j<e\Rightarrow W_j\not\equiv W_e\,\}\). The authors investigate these sets for various choices of~\(\equiv\) (such as \(=\), \(=^*\), \(\equiv_T\), \(\equiv_m\), and~\(\equiv_1\)), examining the possible complexity in the arithmetical hierarchy of their subsets. A typical result here is that for~\(\equiv_T\), the minimal index set contains no infinite \(\Sigma_3\) subset, but it does contain an infinite \(\Sigma_4\) subset. In contrast, whether or not the minimal index set for \(\equiv_T\) contains an infinite \(\Pi_3\) subset depends on the choice of Gödel numbering for the c.e. sets.
- On Some Complexity Characteristics of Immune Sets
- ON THE STRUCTURE OF FAMILIES OF IMMUNE, HYPERIMMUNE AND HYPERHYPERIMMUNE SETS
- Hyperimmunity in \(2^{\mathbb N}\)
- Theory and Applications of Models of Computation
- \(e\)-immune sets
- Immunity for closed sets
- Extending finite subsets of an immune set
- Immune sets in monotone infection rules. Characterization and complexity
- A characterization of the δ20 hyperhyperimmune sets
- The degrees of bi-hyperhyperimmune sets
- On \(\Delta ^ P_ 2\)-immunity
- Bi-immunity over different size alphabets
- Searching for shortest and least programs
- On the Turing degrees of minimal index sets
- On approximate decidability of minimal programs
- An incomplete set of shortest descriptions
- Constructivity conditions on immune sets
- Immunity and non-cupping for closed sets
This page was built for publication: Immunity and hyperimmunity for sets of minimal indices
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q929628)