In SDP Relaxations, Inaccurate Solvers Do Robust Optimization

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We interpret some wrong results (due to numerical inaccuracies) already observed when solving SDP-relaxations for polynomial optimization on a double precision floating point SDP solver. It turns out that this behavior can be explained and justified satisfactorily by a relatively simple paradigm. In such a situation, the SDP solver (and not the user) performs some `robust optimization' without being told to do so. Instead of solving the original optimization problem with nominal criterion f, it uses a new criterion ildef which belongs to a ball mathbfBinfty(f,varepsilon) of small radius varepsilon>0, centered at the nominal criterion f in the parameter space. In other words the resulting procedure can be viewed as a `max−min' robust optimization problem with two players (the solver which maximizes on mathbfBinfty(f,varepsilon) and the user who minimizes over the original decision variables). A mathematical rationale behind this `autonomous' behavior is described.






Describes a project that uses

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: In SDP Relaxations, Inaccurate Solvers Do Robust Optimization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5233101)