In praise of tedious permutation
Tests of the null hypothesis by repeated permutation of the observed data are brutally simple, valid on the basis of only a few assumptions, and adaptable to any test statistic of interest. The history of permutation tests is briefly reviewed, from the pioneering work of R. A. Fisher in the 1930s, to contemporary applications to human brain mapping by several independent groups. Permutation tests for a difference between two sets of brain images at voxel and cluster levels are described, and compared wherever possible to the corresponding theoretical tests. It is shown that nominal Type I error control by permutation is generally excellent; and that some interesting statistics, such as the ``mass of a suprathreshold voxel cluster, are more accessible to testing by permutation than theory. Some limitations of permutation tests are discussed. On balance, the case for permutation tests of the null hypothesis in brain mapping is strong. For the entire collection see [Zbl 0960.00021].
- The advantage of truncated permutations
- A permutation approach to evaluate hyperhomocysteinemia in epileptic patients
- Simple permutations mix even better
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1165683 (Why is no real title available?)
- Covariate-adjusted nonparametric analysis of magnetic resonance images using Markov chain Monte Carlo
- Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review
- Learning Theory
- Two applications of permutation tests in biostatistics
- Invalid permutation tests
This page was built for publication: In praise of tedious permutation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4425375)