Phase transitions for Gödel incompleteness (Q1006619)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Phase transitions for Gödel incompleteness
scientific article

    Statements

    Phase transitions for Gödel incompleteness (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 March 2009
    0 references
    Phase transition is a notion borrowed from physics. An everyday version is that of ice changing into water at \(0^\circ\) C. In logic, the oldest and best-known example is the provability of transfinite induction up to \(\alpha\), \(\text{TI}(\alpha)\), in PA. Gentzen showed in 1943 that \(\text{PA}\vdash \text{TI}(\alpha)\) for any \(\alpha< \varepsilon_0\), but all of a sudden (so to speak) \(\text{PA}\not\vdash \text{TI}(\alpha)\) at \(\alpha= \varepsilon_0\). In this paper, the author considers combinatorial well-foundedness \(\text{CWF}(\beta,c,f_\alpha)\), formulated by H. Friedman. It is, by definition, \[ \forall\,K\,\exists\,L\,\forall\,\alpha_0,\dots, \alpha_L< \beta\;[\forall\,i\leq L\;(c(\alpha_i)< K+ f_\alpha(i)]\to \exists\,i< L\;(\alpha_i\leq \alpha_{i+1}), \] where \(\beta\) is an ordinal, \(c\) is a complexity measure of ordinals by natural numbers, and \(\{f_\alpha\}\) is an increasing -- with respect to majoration -- family of functions parametrized by ordinals. The author considers two complexity measures: the Mahler norm, \(M\), and the Gödel numbering, \(G\). [These are obtained from the Cantor normal form of \(\alpha\) by replacing \(\omega\) by 2, and by successive prime numbers, respectively.] First he establishes asymptotic behaviours of these measures by using Tauberian theorems, etc. (He aptly call them ``main results''.) Since the author considers not only PA but also its subsystems \(\text{I}\Sigma_d\), \(d\in\mathbb{N}\), there are four types of transition theorems: matching the two theories, PA and \(\text{I}\Sigma_d\), with the two measures, \(M\) and \(G\). For the combination of \(\text{I}\Sigma_d\) and \(M\), the theorem runs as follows. First, define the appropriate function \(f_\alpha\) from the Schwichtenberg-Wainer \(F_\alpha\) by means of repeated exponentiation, logarithm, and root. \{It is exhibited, but too complicated to reproduce here.\} Then \(\text{I}\Sigma_d\vdash\text{CWF}(\omega_{d+1}, M,f)\) if \(\alpha< \omega_d\), but \(\not\vdash\) if \(\alpha= \omega_d\). In other combinations, different functions are used, but the pattern of theorems is the same. For PA, it takes the form: \(\text{PA}\vdash\text{CWF}(\varepsilon_0,\cdot,\cdot)\), of course.
    0 references
    analytic combinatorics
    0 references
    proof-theoretic ordinals
    0 references
    phase transitions
    0 references
    Gödel incompleteness
    0 references
    Friedman-style independence results
    0 references
    Tauberian theory
    0 references
    provability
    0 references
    unprovability
    0 references
    asymptotic behaviour
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references