Extensions and biextensions of locally constant group schemes, tori and abelian schemes (Q1006833)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5533154
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Extensions and biextensions of locally constant group schemes, tori and abelian schemes
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5533154

      Statements

      Extensions and biextensions of locally constant group schemes, tori and abelian schemes (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      26 March 2009
      0 references
      Let \(S\) be a scheme. By a semiabelian scheme over \(S\) we understand a group scheme over \(S\) which is an extension of an abelian scheme \(A\) over \(S\) by an \(S\)--torus \(T\). The objective of the paper under review is to study biextensions of a pair of semiabelian schemes \((G_1, G_2)\) by a third semiabelian scheme \(G_3\). The definition of biextensions (introduced by D. Mumford in 1968) is briefly recalled and motivated. \smallskip The author's main result is that biextensions of \((G_1, G_2)\) by \(G_3\) are essentially the same as biextensions of \((A_1, A_2)\) by \(T_3\), where the semiabelian scheme \(G_i\) is an extension of the abelian scheme \(A_i\) by the torus \(T_i\). This includes for example that biextensions of a pair of abelian schemes \((A_1, A_2)\) by a third abelian scheme \(A_3\) are trivial. \smallskip In order to obtain this result, homomorphism groups and extension groups, as well as the associated fppf-sheafs on \(S\) involving tori and abelian schemes are computed. Also locally constant group schemes, locally isomorphic to a finitely generated free commutative group (that is, character groups of tori) have to be taken into account. On the way several representability results are obtained. \smallskip Throughout the article much attention is paid to keep the assumptions on the base scheme \(S\) minimal. Many of the technical difficulties stem from this.
      0 references
      0 references
      Biextensions
      0 references
      Extensions
      0 references
      Abelian schemes
      0 references
      Tori {Biextensions, Extensions, Abelian schemes, Tori}
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references