Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (Q1014775)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5549500
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat.
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5549500

      Statements

      Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (English)
      0 references
      29 April 2009
      0 references
      A right \(S\)-poset \(A_S\) is called `subpullback flat' (resp. `subequalizer flat') if the functor \(A_S\otimes-\) preserves subpullbacks (resp. subequalizers). It is proved that if \(S\) is a non-trivial, commutative, cancellative pomonoid in which 1 is the greatest element, then the one-element \(S\)-poset \(\Theta_S\) is subpullback flat but is not subequalizer flat. A new proof of the fact that a pullback flat \(S\)-act is equalizer flat is presented as well.
      0 references
      0 references
      ordered monoids
      0 references
      \(S\)-posets
      0 references
      flatness
      0 references
      po-acts
      0 references
      categories of acts
      0 references
      pullbacks
      0 references
      equalizers
      0 references
      partially ordered acts
      0 references

      Identifiers