Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (Q1014775)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat.
scientific article

    Statements

    Subpullback flat \(S\)-posets need not be subequalizer flat. (English)
    0 references
    29 April 2009
    0 references
    A right \(S\)-poset \(A_S\) is called `subpullback flat' (resp. `subequalizer flat') if the functor \(A_S\otimes-\) preserves subpullbacks (resp. subequalizers). It is proved that if \(S\) is a non-trivial, commutative, cancellative pomonoid in which 1 is the greatest element, then the one-element \(S\)-poset \(\Theta_S\) is subpullback flat but is not subequalizer flat. A new proof of the fact that a pullback flat \(S\)-act is equalizer flat is presented as well.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    ordered monoids
    0 references
    \(S\)-posets
    0 references
    flatness
    0 references
    po-acts
    0 references
    categories of acts
    0 references
    pullbacks
    0 references
    equalizers
    0 references
    partially ordered acts
    0 references
    0 references