Lower bounds for local versions of dimension reductions (Q1017913)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5553467
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Lower bounds for local versions of dimension reductions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5553467

      Statements

      Lower bounds for local versions of dimension reductions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      13 May 2009
      0 references
      The paper is devoted to the following problem: given a graph \(G = (V ,E)\) on \(V = [n] = {1, 2, \dots, n}\), \(\varepsilon > 0\) and vectors \(x_1,\dots , x_n\in\mathbb{R}^n\), what is the minimal \(k\in \mathbb{N}\) such that there are vectors \(y_1,\dots, y_n\in \mathbb{R}^k\) satisfying \((1-\varepsilon)\| x_i -x_j\| \leq \| y_i -y_j\| \leq (1+\varepsilon)\| x_i-x_j\| \) for every \((i,j)\in E\)? In the case when \(G\) is the complete graph \(K_n\) on \(n\) vertices, this problem is addressed by the well-known result of \textit{W.\,B.\thinspace Johnson} and \textit{J.\,Lindenstrauss} [Contemp.\ Math.\ 26, 189--206 (1984; Zbl 0539.46017)] which asserts that in this case \(k\) can be taken to be \(O(\log n/(\varepsilon^2))\) and an example due to \textit{N.\,Alon} [Combin.\ Probab.\ Comput.\ 18, No.\,1--2, 3--15 (2009; doi:10.1017/S0963548307008917)] which shows that, for \(K_n\), this is basically the best possible; in this example, \(k\) must be \(\Omega(\log n/(\varepsilon^2 \log(1/\varepsilon)))\). The authors are mostly interested in the case when \(G\) is the graph induced by the \(m\) nearest neighbors of \(x_1,\dots , x_n\). That is, \((i,j)\in E\) if and only if \(x_j\) is among the \(m\) nearest neighbors to \(x_i\) or \(x_i\) is among the \(m\) nearest neighbors to \(x_j\). The problem in this case was suggested by [\textit{I.\,Abraham, Y.\,Batal} and \textit{O.\,Neiman}, in: Proceedings of the 39th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC'07), San Diego, June 11--13, 2007, 631--640 (2007; Zbl 1232.68160)], it is motivated by several applications discussed in their paper. The authors find an example (with \(m = 3\)) such that for each sufficiently small \(\varepsilon > 0\), \(k\) still needs to be \(\Omega(\log n)\). The authors do not obtain good dependence on \(\varepsilon\). More precise results are obtained in the case when we additionally require that the mapping \(x_i\mapsto y_i\) preserves the set of nearest neighbors.
      0 references
      Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma
      0 references
      dimension reduction
      0 references
      nearest neighbors
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references