Finite element calculation of viscoelastic flow in a journal bearing. II. Moderate eccentricity (Q1080301)

Finite element calculations of two-dimensional flows of viscoelastic fluids in a journal bearing geometry reported in part I [the authors, ibid. 16, 141-172 (1984; Zbl 0559.76015)] are extended to higher eccentricity \((\epsilon =0.4)\); at this higher eccentricity flow separation occurs in the wide part of the gap for a Newtonian fluid. Calculations for the second-order fluid (SOF), upper-convected Maxwell (UCM), and the Giesekus models [\textit{H. Giesekus}, ibid. 11, 69-109 (1982; Zbl 0492.76004)] are continued in increasing Deborah number of each model until either a limit point is reached or oscillations in the solution make the numerical accuracy too poor to warrant proceeding. No steady solutions to the UCM model were found beyond a limit point \(De_ c\), as was the case for results at low eccentricities. The value of \(De_ c\) was moderately stable to mesh refinement. A limit point also terminated the calculations with a SOF model, in contradiction to the theorems for uniqueness and existence for this model. The critical value of De increased drastically with increasing refinement of the mesh, as expected for solution pathology caused by approximation error. Calculations for the Giesekus fluid with the mobility parameter \(\alpha\) \(\neq 0\) showed no limit points, but failed when irregular oscillations destroyed the quality of the solution. The behavior of the recirculation region of the flow and the load on the inner cylinder were very sensitive to the value of \(\alpha\) used in the Giesekus model. The recirculation disappeared at low values of De except when the mobility parameter \(\alpha\) was so small that the viscosity was almost constant over the range of shear rates in the calculations. The recirculation persistent over the entire range of accessible De for the UCM fluid, the limit of \(\alpha =0\) of the Giesekus model. The behavior of the recirculation is coupled directly to the viscosity by calculations with an inelastic fluid with the same viscosity predicted by the Giesekus model.