New unitary representations of loop groups (Q1082423)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | New unitary representations of loop groups |
scientific article |
Statements
New unitary representations of loop groups (English)
0 references
1986
0 references
Let \({\mathfrak g}\) be a finite dimensional complex simple Lie algebra with a Cartan subalgebra \({\mathfrak h}\) and a fixed positive root-system for \(({\mathfrak g,h})\). Let \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\) denote the loop algebra \(L({\mathfrak g})=L\otimes {\mathfrak g}\) \((L={\mathbb C}[t,t^{-1}])\) together with a derivation \(d\). Now fix \(k>0\); a sequence \(a=(a_ 1,...,a_ k)\) of distinct complex numbers; and representations \(W_ 1,...,W_ k\) of \({\mathfrak g}\). Then \(L(W_ 1\otimes...\otimes W_ k)\) can be given a 'natural' structure of \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\)-module as follows: \[ (f\cdot \Omega)(z)=(\sum^{k}_{i=1}1\otimes... \otimes f(a_ iz)\otimes... \otimes 1)\Omega (z),\quad (d\Omega)(z)=z d\Omega /dz, \] for all \(f\in L({\mathfrak g})\), \(\Omega\in L(\otimes^{k}_{i=1}W_ i)\) and \(z\in {\mathbb C}^*\). If we take now for \(W_ 1,...,W_ k\) the irreducible representations \(V(\lambda_ 1),...,V(\lambda_ k)\) of highest weights \((\lambda_ 1,...,\lambda_ k)\) resp., then \(L(W_ 1\otimes... \otimes W_ k)\) with the above module structure is denoted by \(V(\lambda,a)\) and is called the `loop module'. Further, to any pair \((\lambda,a)\) as above, the authors associate a character \(\chi_{(\lambda,a)}: \cup (L(h)\to L\) and show that the image of \(\chi_{(\lambda,a)}\) is a Laurent subring \({\mathbb C}[t^ r,t^{-r}]\), for some \(r\geq 0.\) The aim of the paper under review is to give an explicit realization of irreducible modules in the category \({\mathcal I}_{\text{fin}}\) studied earlier by the first author [Invent. Math. 85, 317--335 (1986; Zbl 0603.17011)]. More specifically some of the principal results are: (a) \(V(\lambda,a)\) is the direct sum of \(r\) irreducible representations of \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\), which are all mutually \(L({\mathfrak g})\)-isomorphic (but not \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\)-isomorphic). (b) Assume further that all the \(\lambda_ i\) are dominant integral. Then \((b_ 1)\) \(V(\lambda,a)\) is an integrable \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\)- module. \((b_ 2)\) \(V(\lambda,a)\) is unitarizable with respect to the standard 'compact' real form of \(\bar L({\mathfrak g})\) iff \(| a_ i| =| a_ j|\), for all \(i\) and \(j\). For any fixed \(b\in {\mathbb C}\), one can twist the action of d on \(V(\lambda,a)\) by defining \((d\Omega)(z)=b\Omega(z)+z(d\Omega/dz)\). Denote \(V(\lambda,a)\) with the twisted \(d\)-action by \(V(\lambda,a,b)\). Now any integrable module \(V(\lambda,I)\) (notation as in the first author's paper) is isomorphic with an irreducible piece of \(V(\lambda,a,b)\), for suitable choices of \(\lambda\), \(a\), and \(b\). Some of the results of this paper have recently been extended by \textit{S. Eswara Rao} [J. Algebra 275, No. 1, 59--74 (2004; Zbl 1138.17009)].
0 references
unitarizable modules
0 references
loop algebra
0 references
irreducible representations
0 references
highest weights
0 references
loop module
0 references
character
0 references
Laurent subring
0 references
explicit realization of irreducible modules
0 references
category \({\mathcal I}_{fin}\)
0 references
integrable module
0 references