On tensor products of representations of motion groups (Q1097973)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4036086
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On tensor products of representations of motion groups
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4036086

      Statements

      On tensor products of representations of motion groups (English)
      0 references
      1989
      0 references
      It is an immediate consequence of the orthogonality relations for characters that if \(\pi\) and \(\rho\) are irreducible representations of a compact group G, then the tensor product \(\pi\) \(\otimes {\bar \rho}\) of \(\pi\) with the conjugate of \(\rho\) contains the trivial l-dimensional representation \(l_ G\) if and only if \(\rho =\pi\). When dealing with arbitrary groups and infinite dimensional representations, containment has to be replaced by weak containment. Results of this nature have recently been obtained for various classes of locally compact groups including simply connected nilpotent Lie groups, nilpotent discrete groups and groups with relatively compact conjugacy classes. In this paper motion groups are studied. Thus, let G be a semi-direct product \(G=K\ltimes N\) of a compact connected Lie group K and a (second countable) abelian normal subgroup N, and let \(\pi\) \(\in \hat G\), the set of (equivalence classes of) irreducible representations of G. By Mackey's theory, \(\pi\) is an induced representation \(\pi =ind\) \(G_{G_{\lambda}}(\alpha \lambda)\) where \(\lambda\) \(\in \hat N\), \(G_{\lambda}\) the stability subgroup of \(\lambda\) and \(\alpha \in (G_{\lambda}\cap K)^{\wedge}\). The main and somewhat surprising result is that the following conditions on \(\pi\) turn out to be equivalent (\(\prec\) denotes weak containment): (i) For any representation \(\rho\) of G, \(l_ G\prec \pi \otimes {\bar \rho}\) implies \(\pi\) \(\prec \rho.\) (ii) For every \(\rho\) \(\in \hat G\), \(l_ G\prec \pi \otimes {\bar \rho}\) implies \(\rho =\pi\). (iii) For every closed subgroup H of G and \(\tau\) \(\in \hat H\), \(\tau\) \(\prec \pi | H\) implies \(\pi \prec ind\) \(G_ H\tau.\) (iv) If \(L_{\lambda}\) denotes the largest normal subgroup of K contained in \(K_{\lambda}=G_{\lambda}\cap K\), then \(ind_{L_{\lambda}}^{K_{\lambda}}(\alpha | L_{\lambda})\) is a multiple of \(\alpha\). The proofs are fairly complicated and use detailed knowledge about the dual space topology on \(\hat G\).
      0 references
      irreducible representations
      0 references
      tensor product
      0 references
      locally compact groups
      0 references
      motion groups
      0 references
      compact connected Lie group
      0 references
      induced representation
      0 references
      weak containment
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers