Presentations of modules when ideals need not be principal (Q1100540)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4044035
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Presentations of modules when ideals need not be principal
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4044035

      Statements

      Presentations of modules when ideals need not be principal (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1988
      0 references
      This paper studies presentations of modules. A presentation is a surjection \(f: P\to U\), where P is a finitely generated projective \(\Lambda\)-module and U is a \(\Lambda\)-module. Generalizing elementary divisor theory, two presentations f, g of U by P are called equivalent if \(f=\beta g\alpha\) for some \(\beta\) \(\in Aut U\) and \(\alpha\) \(\in Aut P\). If \(\Lambda\) is a commutative PID, one can restate the main result of elementary divisor theory as: any two presentations of U by P are equivalent. In this article, \(\Lambda\) is semiprime and module finite over its noetherian one dimensional center R. It is shown that the set of stable equivalence classes of presentations, pres(P,U), forms an abelian group. (Under mild hypotheses, stable equivalence classes are actual equivalence classes, for example, this is always true for \(\Lambda\) commutative.) If \(\Lambda\) is a prime maximal R-order, then \(pres(P,U)=0\) and if, in addition the uniform rank of the kernel is at least two, then any two presentations of U by P are equivalent. In particular, this answers a fifty year old question of Nakayama in the special case that \(\Lambda\) is a noncommutative PID module finite over its center. (The two authors, together with \textit{C. Odenthal} [in ``Elementary divisor theorem for noncommutative PID's'', Proc. Am. Math. Soc. (1988)] have completely settled the Nakayama question.) If \(\Lambda\) is not a maximal order, then ``unique presentation'' still holds in some situations. For example, this is true when \(\Lambda\) is a finitely generated algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero and Z has finite length. To study the problem when \(\Lambda\) is not a maximal order, a Mayer- Vietoris sequence is used. From this one finds that if I is a conductor ideal from a maximal order \(\Gamma\), P is a progenerator, and ker f is faithful, then pres(P,U) is a homomorphic image of \(K_ 1(\Lambda /I\Lambda)\). If \(\Lambda\) is commutative and U of finite length, then pres(P,U) has bounded exponent. Examples are given to show that pres(P,U) can be rather large. If \(\Lambda\) is a classical \({\mathbb{Z}}\)-order, then \(| pres(P,U)| \leq n\) for \(n=n(\Lambda)\) depending only on \(\Lambda\). This is true for actual (not merely stable) equivalence classes as well if \(A={\mathbb{Q}}\Lambda\) has no simple summand \(M_ r(D)\) where D is a totally definite quaternion algebra. If A violates this ``Eichler condition'', then there is no bound on the number of presentations of U by P (as P, U vary), although there is bound for any given P, U.
      0 references
      presentations of modules
      0 references
      finitely generated projective \(\Lambda \) - module
      0 references
      semiprime
      0 references
      stable equivalence classes of presentations
      0 references
      noncommutative PID module finite over its center
      0 references
      prime maximal R-order
      0 references
      uniform rank
      0 references
      finitely generated algebra
      0 references
      Mayer-Vietoris sequence
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references