Irreducibility results for separated variables equations (Q1103673)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Irreducibility results for separated variables equations
scientific article

    Statements

    Irreducibility results for separated variables equations (English)
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    Let K be a field of characteristic 0, \(f_ 1,...,f_{\ell}\in K(x)\) be nonconstant rational functions. Write \(f_ i=h_{i1}/h_{i2}\) where \(h_{i1},h_{i2}\in K[x]\) are coprime. Denote by \(V(f_ 1(X_ 1)+...+f_ 1(X_ 1))\) the algebraic set in affine \(\ell\)-space \({\mathbb{A}}_ K^{\ell}\) defined by the polynomial \(\prod^{\ell}_{i=1}h_{i2}(X_ i)\sum^{\ell}_{i=1}f_ i(X_ i).\) The main theorem states: If \(\ell \geq 3\) then \(V(f_ 1(X_ 1)+...+f_{\ell}(X_{\ell}))\) is irreducible. This was proved by \textit{A. Schinzel} - even for arbitrary K, but only for polynomials - [cf. Pac. J. Math. 118, 531-563 (1985; Zbl 0571.12011)]. The author gives a short proof of the main theorem using Galois-theoretic methods and results of one of his earlier papers [Ill. J. Math. 17, 128-146 (1973; Zbl 0266.14013)]. He also indicates how these results can help to shorten arguments of Schinzel in the case of positive characteristic. Now let \(\ell =2\) and \(K={\mathbb{C}}\). For positive integers n,m let \({\mathcal R}(n,m)\) denote the set of ordered pairs (h,g) of rational functions in \({\mathbb{C}}(x)\) of respective degrees n and m. To exclude trivial cases the author introduces the concept of newly reducible pairs; if h and g are polynomials then this implies that they have the same degree. - The existence of a newly reducible pair \((h,g)\in {\mathcal R}(n,m)\) is equivalent to a pure group theoretic existence problem (theorem 2.3); as a consequence one gets, that for each \(n>3\) there exists m and newly reducible \((h,g)\in {\mathcal R}(n,m)\). The existence problem for polynomials is open; if h in addition has the property that there are no proper subfields between \({\mathbb{C}}(x)\) and \({\mathbb{C}}(h(x))\) then the existence of newly reducible pairs of polynomials in \({\mathcal R}(n,m)\) implies \(n\in \{7,11,13,15,21,31\}\) [by using the classification of finite simple groups; see the author, ``Rigidity and applications of the classification of finite simple groups to monodromy'', Part II (Preprint)] and for every such n there exists (h,g) (cf. loc. cit.). The (n,m)-problem might helps to solve the existence problem mentioned above: Call a pair \((h',g')\) of polynomials in \({\mathcal R}(n,m)\) hereditarily irreducible if \(V(h'(h_ 1)-g'(g_ 1))\) is irreducible for each pair of nonconstant polynomials \((h_ 1,g_ 1)\). The (n,m) problem is the following: Does there exist an hereditarily irreducible \((h',g\}\) in \({\mathcal R}(n,m)?\) For \(n=m=2\) the answer is negative. The (2,3)-problem has an affirmative solution if there exists a group with certain properties. In the description of this group a parameter \(k=\gcd (n\cdot \deg (g_ 1),m\cdot \deg (h_ 1))/1cm(n,m)\) occurs. The author shows that in case \(k=1,2\) there is no group with the required properties. The cases \(k\geq 3\) remain open.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    irreducibility of sets defined by multivariate polynomials
    0 references
    classification of finite simple groups
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references