Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes (Q1106547)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4062285
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4062285

      Statements

      Poisson approximations for time-changed point processes (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1988
      0 references
      Let N be the point process belonging to a strictly increasing unbounded sequence of finite stopping times \(0<T_ 1<T_ 2<..\). of a filtration \({\mathcal F}=({\mathcal F}(t))_{t\geq 0}\) and denote A its ``compensator'', that is the unique \({\mathcal F}\)-predictable stochastic process with increasing paths such that \(A(0)=0\) and N-A is a local martingale, and \(\hat N\) its ``time transformed point process'', that is the point process belonging to the sequence \(0<A(T_ 1)<A(T_ 2)<\dots\) One important result on time transformed point processes states (Meyer 1971): Let \(N = (N_1, N_2, \dots, N_ k)\) be a vector of point processes. Suppose that A1) for any \(i \neq j\) the probability that \(N_ i\) and \(N_ j\) have common jumps is 0, and A2) the compensators \(A_ i\) of \(N_ i\) are continuous, then the vector \(\hat N = (\hat N_1, \hat N_2, \dots, \hat N_ k)\) of the time transformed point processes is a vector \(\Pi = (\Pi_1, \Pi_2, \dots, \Pi_ k)\) of independent unit rate Poisson processes. This statement is not true, if the two assumptions A1) and A2) do not hold. In that case, this paper provides an explicit bound for the total variation distance \(d(\hat N(t), \Pi (t))\).
      0 references
      survival models.
      0 references
      point process
      0 references
      stopping times
      0 references
      local martingale
      0 references
      time transformed point processes
      0 references
      variation distance
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers