On weakly positive unit forms (Q1113972)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On weakly positive unit forms
scientific article

    Statements

    On weakly positive unit forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1988
    0 references
    An integral quadratic form q: \({\mathbb{Z}}^ n\to {\mathbb{Z}}\) given by \(q(x)=\sum^{n}_{a=1}x^ 2_{a}+\sum_{a<b}q_{ab}x_ ax_ b\) is called a unit form. In a natural way, with every unit form is associated a nonoriented multigraph with the edges of two kinds and no loops. q is said to be weakly positive if \(q(x)>0\) whenever \(x\neq 0\) and \(x_{a}\geq 0\) for all a; q is said to be a critical form if it is not weakly positive but every form obtained from q by fixing some of the \(x_ a's\) equal to zero is weakly positive. The author obtains a criterion for weak positivity of unit forms by giving a combinatorial classification of the critical forms in terms of the associated multigraphs. The results of the paper generalize those of \textit{S. A. Ovsienko} [Integral weakly positive forms, in Schurian matrix problems and quadratic forms, Prepr. Inst. Math. Acad. Sci. Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, (Russian), 3-17 (1978)]. In addition, the author presents another approach to the results of \textit{K. Bongartz}, [Manuscr. Math. 46, 117-136 (1984; Zbl 0537.16024)] and \textit{D. Happel} and \textit{D. Vossieck} [ibid. 42, 221-243 (1983; Zbl 0516.16023)]. A criterion for weak positivity of an arbitrary real quadratic form p: \({\mathbb{R}}^ n\to {\mathbb{R}}\), given by \(p(x)=\sum^{n}_{a,b=1}p_{ab}x_ ax_ b\), where \(p_{ab}=p_{ba}\) for all a, b, was obtained by \textit{M. V. Zel'dich} [Linear algebra and representation theory, Collect. Sci. Works, Kiev 1983, 135-137 (1983; Zbl 0583.15009)]. Since the latter paper is not easily accessible to the English-speaking reader, it seems worthwhile to state its main result. Namely, p is weakly positive if and only if every symmetric submatrix S of its matrix \(P=[p_{ab}]\), including P itself, satisfies either of the following two conditions: (i) \(\det (S)>0\), (ii) there exists an element of S whose cofactor (in S) is nonpositive. It might be interesting to investigate whether the above statement can be used to simplify the proofs in the paper under review.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    quadratic form
    0 references
    unit form
    0 references
    nonoriented multigraph
    0 references
    critical form
    0 references
    weak positivity
    0 references
    combinatorial classification
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references