An inverse diffraction problem with discrete data (Q1122968)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4108114
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    An inverse diffraction problem with discrete data
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4108114

      Statements

      An inverse diffraction problem with discrete data (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1987
      0 references
      The author considers the inverse problem which aims at the exploration of the shape of a bounded radiating aperture \(\Omega\) in an infinite plane through some discrete data obtained by measurements on another plane, parallel to the first. The sampling points where the measurements are performed, say \(x_{nm}\) ((n,m)\(\in I)\) are supposed to be known only approximately and lie in some suitable neighbourhoods of points \(\tilde x_{nm}\) of a certain given periodic lattice. Here \(I\subset Z^ 2\) is a finite set of indices. The mathematical statement of the problem is as follows: Given positive numbers \(k^ 2\), \(\epsilon\), \(\delta\), t, real numbers \(\tilde x_{nm}\) and complex numbers \(g_{nm}\), find a bounded set \(\Omega\) such that there exist u(x,t), \(\bar x_{nm}\) and \(\chi_{\Omega}(x)\) satisfying \(\Delta u(x,z)+k^ 2u(x,z)=0\), \(x\in {\mathbb{R}}^ 2\), \(z>0\), \(\sum_{(n,m)\in I}| u(\bar x_{nm},t)- g_{nm}|^ 2\leq \epsilon\), \(| \bar x_{nm}-\tilde x_{nm}| \leq \delta\), (n,m)\(\in I\), \[ (*)\quad \lim_{\rho \to \infty}\int_{S_{\rho}}| \partial u/\partial n-iku|^ 2d\sigma =0,\quad u(x,0)=\chi_{\Omega}(x),\quad (\chi_{\Omega}\equiv 0\quad if\quad x\not\in \Omega). \] Here \(S_{\rho}\) stands for the upper half sphere of radius \(\rho\) while \(\partial /\partial n\) is the derivative in the outer normal direction. It is worthwhile to remark that the statement of the problem, written in the paper, is slightly different from the above-one. For example the function \(\chi_{\Omega}(x)\) is presented by the author as to be the characteristic function of the set \(\Omega\), which necessitates \(\chi_{\Omega}(x)\equiv 1\) for \(x\in \Omega\) (this is not true in general). Similarly, the impinging wave is stated by the author as to be a plane wave travelling from infinity, which is a contradiction, in general, to the radiation condition (*) because u denotes the total field. In fact, the incident field can (and must) be any wave with source lying in the lower half-space \(z<0.\) This problem is a generalization of what was previously considered by the author himself, which corresponds to the case \(\delta =0\) [Numer. Funct. Anal. Optimization 9, 327-357 (1987; Zbl 0632.65124)]. A solution to the problem is obtained through cardinal series. The influence of the number of sampling points as well as the contaminations due to noisy data are discussed.
      0 references
      inverse diffraction
      0 references
      discrete data
      0 references
      inverse scattering
      0 references
      cardinal series
      0 references
      Helmholtz equation
      0 references
      inverse problem
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references