Position of subspaces in spaces: Relative versions of compactness, Lindelöf properties, and separation axioms (Q1173557)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Position of subspaces in spaces: Relative versions of compactness, Lindelöf properties, and separation axioms
scientific article

    Statements

    Position of subspaces in spaces: Relative versions of compactness, Lindelöf properties, and separation axioms (English)
    0 references
    25 June 1992
    0 references
    The authors define relative versions of certain standard topological properties and state certain theorems and examples concerning them. No proofs are given. Let \(X\) be a topological space and let \(Y\) be a subspace of \(X\). The authors say that \(Y\) is regular (superregular) in \(X\) if for each \(y\in Y\) and any set \(A\) which is closed in \(X\) and not containing \(y\) there are disjoint subsets \(U\) and \(V\) open in \(X\) such that \(y\in U\) and \(A\cap Y\subseteq V\) (respectively, \(y\in U\) and \(A\subseteq V\)). They define \(Y\) to be strongly regular in \(X\) if for each \(x\in X\) and each set \(F\) not containing \(x\) and closed in \(X\) there are disjoint open sets \(U\), \(W\) in \(X\) such that \(x\in U\) and \(F\cap Y\subseteq W\). Proposition 1: There exists a \(T_ 2\)-space \(X\) having a countable closed discrete subspace \(Y\) such that \(Y\) is not regular in \(X\). A space \(Y\) is called strongly normal in a space \(X\) if for any two disjoint sets \(A\) and \(B\) closed in \(Y\) there are disjoint open sets \(U\) and \(V\) in \(X\) such that \(A\subseteq U\) and \(B\subseteq V\). Theorem 1: Suppose \(Y\) is regular in \(X\) and \(Y\) is a Lindelöf subspace. Then \(Y\) is strongly normal in \(X\). Propositions 6 and 7: If \(Y\) is compact in a \(T_ 2\)-space \(X\), then \(Y\) is strongly regular in \(X\), but \(Y\) is not necessarily superregular in \(X\). The paper contains other generalizations of classical theorems of general topology and several examples showing the scope and limitations of the results obtained. The paper concludes with a problem.
    0 references
    supernormal subspace
    0 references
    superregular subspace
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references