On the regularity of solutions in convex integration theory (Q1174476)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the regularity of solutions in convex integration theory
scientific article

    Statements

    On the regularity of solutions in convex integration theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    25 June 1992
    0 references
    This article gives a negative answer to a question raised by \textit{M. L. Gromov} in Section 2.4 of his book Partial differential relations (1986; Zbl 0651.53001) about the regularity of solutions of certain undetermined systems. The counterexamples are ``triangular'' systems of order \(r\) with arbitrarily smooth coefficients, for which Gromov's convex integration theory [op. cit.] provides ``many'' solutions of class \(C^ r\), but which have ``few'' \(C^{r+1}\) solutions. The simplest example is the following: (*) \(\| \partial_ x f\|^ 2= \| \partial_ y f\|^ 2= A(x,y,f)\), for a map \(f:[0,1]\times [0,1]\to\mathbb{R}^ 2\), where \(A\) is \(C^ 1\), positive, and satisfies \(\partial_ x f\pm \partial_ y f\neq 0\) everywhere. Using convex integration theory, the author shows that \(C^ 1\) solutions of (*) are \(C^ 0\) dense in the space \({\mathcal S}\) of ``short'' maps, that is, maps which satisfy: \(\| \partial_ x f\|^ 2<A\), \(\|\partial_ y f\|^ 2<A\). On the other hand, it is easy to see that a \(C^ 2\) solution is necessarily an immersion, so that such solutions are not \(C^ 0\) dense in \({\mathcal S}\): more precisely, a short map whose Jacobian changes sign cannot be \(C^ 0\) approximated by \(C^ 2\) solutions of (*).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    regularity
    0 references
    undetermined systems
    0 references
    Gromov's convex integration
    0 references