Cohomological invariants associated to symmetric bilinear forms (Q1191721)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Cohomological invariants associated to symmetric bilinear forms
scientific article

    Statements

    Cohomological invariants associated to symmetric bilinear forms (English)
    0 references
    27 September 1992
    0 references
    This exposition describes how to apply the machinery of the author's homotopy category of simplicial sheaves to reprove a number of results relating algebraic and topological invariants of Galois representations. Let \(K\) be a field of characteristic different from \(\mathbb{Q}\) and let \(\rho:\Omega_ K\to O_ n(K)\) be an orthogonal Galois representation. Topologically \(\rho\) has Stiefel-Whitney classes, \(SW_ i(\rho)\in H^ i(K;\mathbb{Z}/2)\) obtained by pulling back a universal class, \(w_ i\in H^ i(BO(K^{sep});\mathbb{Z}/2)\). In addition, the spinor norm, \(Sp:O_ n(K)\to H^ 1(K;\mathbb{Z}/2)\) defines a class, \(Sp_ 2[\rho]\in H^ 2(K;\mathbb{Z}/2)\). Finally, by descent theory, \(\rho\) can be considered as a symmetric bilinear form which has classes \(HW_ i(\rho)\in H^ i(K;\mathbb{Z}/2)\) generalizing the Hasse invariant, \(HW_ 2(\rho)\). Relationships between these classes, in dimension 2, were discovered by J.-P. Serre when \(\rho\) is a permutation representation. This fundamental discovery was elaborated upon by A. Fröhlich (in dimension 2), B. Kahn and the reviewer (independently; in higher dimensions). The results are collected in [\textit{V. P. Snaith}, Topological methods in Galois representation theory, Ch. III--IV (1989; Zbl 0673.12009)]. In the homotopy category of simplicial sheaves on the etale site, \((Sh|_ K)_{et}\), \(\rho\) defines a class in \([*,BO_ n]\) where \(n=\text{rank}(\rho)\). The author calculates \(H^*(BO_ n;\mathbb{Z}/2)\) in this homotopy category, obtaining a polynomial ring on Stiefel-Whitney classes. It transpires that \(BO_ n\) is homotopy equivalent to \(BO_ \rho\), the classifying object corresponding to \(\rho\) as a bilinear form. Hence \(H^*(BO_ \rho;\mathbb{Z}/2)\) is also a polynomial algebra and the comparison of the two sets of polynomial generators yields the relations between cohomology classes which was referred to above. The proofs, although in a more abstract setting than they may be used to, will have a familiar feel to the experts. This abstraction is vindicated in a forthcoming paper in which the author generalizes \(Sp_ 2(\rho)\) to arbitrary dimensions and obtains the general formula relating all the \(HW_ i(\rho)\), \(Sp_ i(\rho)\) and \(SW_ i(\rho)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Galois cohomology
    0 references
    characteristic classes
    0 references
    homotopy category of simplicial sheaves
    0 references
    topological invariants
    0 references
    Galois representations
    0 references
    spinor norm
    0 references
    symmetric bilinear form
    0 references
    etale site
    0 references
    Stiefel-Whitney classes
    0 references
    0 references