On interpreting truth tables and relevant truth table logic (Q1203780)

This paper is a critique of \textit{N. Tennant} [``Truth table logic'', Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 30, 459-484 (1989; Zbl 0698.03036)]. It demonstrates that no logic may be ``read off'' from standard truth tables without further assumptions, and that numerous different logics, including First Degree Entailment, may be read off, depending on what these assumptions are.