On 1-cycles and the finite dimensionality of homology 4-manifolds (Q1208255)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 166194
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On 1-cycles and the finite dimensionality of homology 4-manifolds
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 166194

      Statements

      On 1-cycles and the finite dimensionality of homology 4-manifolds (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      16 May 1993
      0 references
      The cell-like maps on manifolds of dimension \(\leq 3\) do not raise dimension, while on manifolds of dimension \(\geq 5\) they can raise dimension. The authors attack the problem of raising dimension by cell- like maps on 4-manifolds as the remaining unsettled case. They have obtained the following result in this direction: Let \(M^ 4\) be a topological 4-manifold and \(f: M^ 4 \to X\) be a proper cell-like onto map. Then \(\dim X < \infty\) if and only if for some \(n \geq 3\), \(X\) has disjoint Pontrjagin \(n\)-tuples property, denoted \(dd_ n\). Property \(dd_ n\) means the following: For every \(\varepsilon > 0\) and every collection of maps \(f_ 1,\dots,f_ n: \mathbb{D}^ 2 \to X\) of the Pontrjagin disc \(\mathbb{D}^ 2\) into \(X\), there exist maps \(g_ 1,\dots,g_ n: \mathbb{D}^ 2 \to X\) such that (i) for every \(i\), \(d(f_ i,g_ i) < \varepsilon\), and (ii) \(\bigcap^ n_{i=1}g_ i(\mathbb{D}^ 2) = \emptyset\). This result is the corollary of a theorem which gives the criterion of finite dimensionality of \(\mathbb{Z}\)-homology 4-manifolds. This theorem reads as follows: Let \(X\) be a \(\mathbb{Z}\)-homology 4-manifold. Then \(\dim X < \infty\) (equivalently \(\dim X = 4\)) if and only if for some \(n \geq 3\) \(X\) has \(dd_ n\). The proof of finite dimensionality of \(X\) involves different results and it contains statements on representations of 1-cycles which are of interest in their own, and in final it is based on presenting \(X\) as the union of two finite dimensional pieces. It is also pointed out that \(dd_ 3\) is more general than \(DD_ 3\) (disjoint triples property of R. J. Daverman). Replacing the Pontrjagin disc \(\mathbb{D}^ 2\) in the definition of \(dd_ 3\) by the disc \(D^ 2\) one has the definition of \(DD_ 3\).
      0 references
      raising dimension
      0 references
      cell-like maps on 4-manifolds
      0 references
      disjoint Pontrjagin \(n\)-tuples property
      0 references
      Pontrjagin disc
      0 references
      finite dimensionality of \(\mathbb{Z}\)- homology 4-manifolds
      0 references

      Identifiers