The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type (Q1277447)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1256815
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1256815

      Statements

      The relationship between some Liouville theorems on Riemannian manifolds of a special type (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      27 April 1999
      0 references
      Let \(M\) be a complete Riemannian manifold and let \(\Delta = \sum_{ij} g^{ij} ({\partial \over \partial x^i} {\partial \over \partial x^j} - \sum_k\Gamma_{ij}^k {\partial \over \partial x^k})\) be the Laplace-Beltrami operator acting on functions. We say that \(M\) satisfies the Liouville theorem (L1) if every bounded solution \(u\) of \(\Delta u = 0\) is constant. Moreover, we say that \(M\) satisfies (L2) if the equation \(\Delta u = \mu u\) has no nontrivial bounded solutions for all \(\mu > 0\). Euclidean space \(M={\mathbb R}^n\) satisfies both (L1) and (L2). Now let \(M\) be the union \(M = B \cup D\) where \(B\) is a compact set and \(D\) is diffeomorphic to \((0,\infty)\times S\), \(S\) compact, and \(D\) carries a warped product metric. The main result of the paper states that for such \(M\) (L1) implies (L2). The converse is not true as one can see from the example of hyperbolic space.
      0 references
      Liouville theorem
      0 references
      Riemannian manifold
      0 references
      Laplace equation
      0 references

      Identifiers