Decomposing modules into direct sums of submodules with types (Q1295761)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Decomposing modules into direct sums of submodules with types
scientific article

    Statements

    Decomposing modules into direct sums of submodules with types (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    27 February 2001
    0 references
    The author introduces two concepts weaker than those of extending modules and quasi-continuous modules. A decomposition theory for these modules analogous to that of extending and quasi-continuous modules is provided. A natural class of \(R\)-modules is a class which is closed under submodules, direct sums, injective hulls and isomorphic copies. For any class \(\mathcal F\) of \(R\)-modules let \({\mathcal C}_F=\{M:\) any nonzero submodule of \(M\) can not embed in an element of \({\mathcal F}\}\) and \({\mathcal D}_F=\{M:\) any nonzero submodule of \(M\) contains a nonzero submodule embeddable in an element of \({\mathcal F}\}\). It is easy to see that both of these are natural classes. Given a module \(M\), a submodule \(N\) of \(M\) is called a type submodule if \(N\) is of type \(\mathcal K\) for some natural class \(\mathcal K\) (i.e. \(N\) is maximal with respect to \(N\in{\mathcal K}\), where \({\mathcal K}={\mathcal C}_F\) and \({\mathcal F}={\mathcal C}_K\)). It is clear that any type submodule is a complement submodule while the converse is not true. Two modules are orthogonal if they have no nonzero isomorphic submodules. The author replaces the `complement submodules' in the definition of \(CS\)-modules and quasi-continuous modules by `type submodules' of \(M\). Hence a \(TS\)-module is defined as one in which every type submodule is a direct summand. Similar to the known condition \((C_3)\) in the definition of quasi-continuous modules, the author introduces condition \((T_3)\): If \(M_1\), \(M_2\) are type summands which are complements of each other, then \(M_1\oplus M_2\) is a summand of \(M\). A \(TS\)-module (even with \(T_3\)) may not be a \(CS\) (i.e. extending) module. Among several interesting results, the author provides a characterization of \(TS\)-modules with \((T_3)\) on the same lines as that of a quasi-continuous module such as: \(M\) is a \(TS\)-module with \((T_3)\) if and only if \(f(M)\subseteq M\) for every idempotent \(f\in\text{End}(E(M))\) with \(\text{im }f\) orthogonal to \(\ker f\), where \(E(M)\) denotes the injective hull of \(M\). Necessary and sufficient conditions are provided for an arbitrary direct sum of pairwise orthogonal modules to become a \(TS\)-module with \((T_3)\). Every family \(\{M_i:i\in I\}\) of pairwise orthogonal modules, \(E(M_i)\) is injective if and only if every \(TS\)-module is a direct sum of atomic modules, if and only if every module contains a maximal injective type submodule. These conditions (among others) are shown to be equivalent to a weaker related ascending chain condition on type right ideals of the ring (t-acc). Several other results are included on \(TS\)-modules and \(TS\)-modules with \(T_3\). The paper concludes with examples showing the relationships of type conditions with \((C_1)\) and \((C_3)\) conditions and a construction of a \(TS\)-module with \((T_3)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    quasi-continuous modules
    0 references
    extending modules
    0 references
    decomposition theory
    0 references
    natural classes of modules
    0 references
    direct sums
    0 references
    injective hulls
    0 references
    type submodules
    0 references
    complement submodules
    0 references
    direct summands
    0 references
    orthogonal modules
    0 references
    ascending chain condition
    0 references
    type right ideals
    0 references
    \(TS\)-modules with \(T_3\)
    0 references