Intersection of independent regenerative sets (Q1295878)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Intersection of independent regenerative sets
scientific article

    Statements

    Intersection of independent regenerative sets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 June 2000
    0 references
    A regenerative set \(\overline{\mathcal R}\) is a closed random subset of \([0,\infty)\) which can be identified with the closed range of a subordinator \(\{\sigma(t)\}_{t\geq 0}\) (i.e. an a.s. increasing Lévy process with \(\sigma(0)=0)\). The problem addressed in this paper is to find the distribution and other properties of the intersection of two independent regenerative sets \(\overline{\mathcal R}^{(1)}\cap\overline{\mathcal R}^{(2)}\). Denote by \(\sigma^{(i)}\), \({\mathcal R}^{(i)}=\sigma^{(i)}([0,\infty))\) the corresponding subordinators, by \(U^{(i)}(dx)\) their potential measures, and by \(R^{(i)}(t)=\inf\{s>0:s+t\in{\mathcal R}^{(i)}\}\) \((\inf\emptyset=\infty)\) the residual life-time process. \(\sigma^{(i)}\) or \({\mathcal R}^{(i)}\) are called heavy [light], if \(\sigma^{(i)}\) has [no] drift. The case where at least one of the sets \({\mathcal R}^{(i)}\) are discrete can be dealt with by arguments of \textit{H. Kesten} [Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 93 (1969; Zbl 0186.50202)] and is omitted here. The author now distinguishes between two situations: \((\sigma^{(1)},\sigma^{(2)})\) are both light, or one of them is heavy, say \(\sigma^{(2)}\). If in the latter case \(U^{(2)}(dx)=u^{(2)}(x)dx\), then \(\mathbb{P}((x+{\mathcal R}^{(1)})\cap{\mathcal R}^{(2)}\neq\emptyset)=U^{(1)}u^{(2)}(x)/U^{(1)}u^{(2)}u(0)\). The proof uses essentially the properties of the local time at \((0,0)\) of \((R^{(1)}(t),R^{(2)}(t))\). This generalizes a result by \textit{J. Hawkes} [Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw. Geb. 37, 243-251 (1977; Zbl 0404.60077)]. The main result of the paper is the (light, light) case. Assuming again \(U^{(2)}(dx)=u^{(2)}(x)dx\) it is shown that \(\mathbb{P}((x+\overline{\mathcal R}^{(1)})\cap\overline{\mathcal R}^{(2)}\neq\emptyset)=c_0U^{(1)}u^{(2)}(x)\) \((0\cdot\infty=0)\) where \(c_0\) is the capacity of \(\{0\}\) for the subordinate process \(X(t)=R^{(1)}\circ\sigma^{(2)}(t)\). Moreover, if \(c_0>0\), then \(0\in{\mathcal R}^{(1)}\) is regular for \(\sigma^{(2)}\) if and only if \(U^{(1)}u^{(2)}\in C(\mathbb{R})\) or \(c_0^{-1}=U^{(1)}u^{(2)}(0)\). The proof relies on potential theoretic methods, in particular on the study of the first return time \(T_0\) of \(X(t)\) to \(\{0\}\). Note that the (light, light) assumption implies for \(x\neq 0\) that \[ \mathbb{P}(\exists t>0,\;\sigma_t^{(2)}\in x+{\mathcal R}^{(1)})=\mathbb{P}\bigl((x+\overline{\mathcal R}^{(1)})\cap\overline{\mathcal R}^{(2)}\neq\emptyset)=\mathbb{P}(T_0<\infty\mid X(0)=x\bigr). \] Immediate corollaries are criteria for (non-)polarity of the set \({\mathcal R}^{(1)}\) for \(\sigma^{(2)}\) which can be expressed in terms of the potential kernels and characteristic exponents of the subordinators. If \(U^{(1)}u^{(2)}\in C(\mathbb{R})\), then \(\overline{\mathcal R}^{(1)}\cap\overline{\mathcal R}^{(2)}\) is itself regenerative with potential measure being absolutely continuous w.r.t. \(U^{(1)}(dx)\). Moreover, \(\{t\geq 0:\sigma^{(2)}(t)\in{\mathcal R}^{(1)}\}\) is also regenerative and its characteristic exponent can be explicitly calculated.
    0 references
    subordinator
    0 references
    subordination
    0 references
    regenerative set
    0 references
    potential operator
    0 references
    polar set
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references