A counterexample to the 0-1 law for the class of existential second-order minimal Gödel sentences with equality (Q1317435)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 529887
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | A counterexample to the 0-1 law for the class of existential second-order minimal Gödel sentences with equality |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 529887 |
Statements
A counterexample to the 0-1 law for the class of existential second-order minimal Gödel sentences with equality (English)
0 references
24 March 1994
0 references
It is shown that the 0-1 law fails for the class of existential second- order sentences whose first-order part is of the form \(\forall x\forall y\exists z\varphi(x,y,z)\) with quantifier-free \(\varphi\). This result completes the characterization of the classes of existential second-order sentences according to its first-order quantifier prefix, for which the 0-1 law holds. It coincides with the characterization of the solvable cases of the decision problem.
0 references
0-1 law
0 references
existential second-order sentences
0 references
0.8829448819160461
0 references
0.818551242351532
0 references
0.8166871070861816
0 references
0.8031625151634216
0 references
