Canonical representations related to hyperbolic spaces (Q1363024)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Canonical representations related to hyperbolic spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Canonical representations related to hyperbolic spaces (English)
    0 references
    2 March 1998
    0 references
    Canonical representations were introduced for the Lobachevsky plane by \textit{A. M. Vershik}, \textit{I. M. Gel'fand} and \textit{M. I. Graev} [Lond. Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 69, 15-110 (1982); translation from Usp. Mat. Nauk 28, 82-128 (1973; Zbl 0288.22005)]. There this notion has been used for the first time. In a general setting -- for Hermitian symmetric spaces -- canonical representations were studied by \textit{F. A. Berezin} [Math. USSR, Izv. 9, 341-379 (1975); translation from Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 39, 363-402 (1975; Zbl 0312.53050); Soviet Math., Dokl. 19, 786-789 (1978); translation from Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 241, 15-17 (1978; Zbl 0439.47038)] for purposes of quantization. Berezin established the correspondence principle, found the spectral decomposition of a transform, called now the Berezin transform, and indicated the relation of canonical representations with tensor products. In the paper under review, the authors consider hyperbolic spaces \(G/K\), where \(G=U(1,n;{\mathbf F})\), \({\mathbf F}={\mathbf R},{\mathbf C},{\mathbf H}\), and \(K\) a maximal compact subgroup. These spaces are Riemannian symmetric spaces of rank one. For \({\mathbf F}={\mathbf C}\) they are Hermitian, the case where canonical representations were defined, but for \({\mathbf F}={\mathbf R},{\mathbf H}\) they do not carry some additional structure (complex or symplectic). All hyperbolic spaces can be realized as unit balls in \({\mathbf F}^n\) with the fractional linear action of \(G\). Using this realization, the authors define canonical representations for any \({\mathbf F}\) by the same formulae as for \({\mathbf F}={\mathbf C}\). These representations are unitary representations and are generated by a positive definite function \(\psi_\lambda(x)= (1-|x|)^\lambda\), \(\lambda\) being a parameter. -- The main results of the paper are: (1) The decomposition of the canonical representations into irreducible unitary representations. It turns out that for \(\lambda\) ``large'' the decomposition contains the principal series representations and for \(\lambda\) ``small'' a finite number of the complementary series representations is added. (2) Explicit expressions for the spherical transform of \(\psi_\lambda\). Moreover, it gives an explicit expression of the Berezin kernel in terms of the Laplacian. (3) The asymptotic behaviour of the Berezin kernel when \(\psi_\lambda\to\infty\) (three terms). Usually, one is content with two terms, which are needed for the correspondence principle. Reviewer's note: The mapping \(\Phi_k\) indicated in Part (ii) of Theorem 2 in Section 11 (concerning the embedding of complementary series representations) is not \(G\)-equivariant for \(k>0\).
    0 references
    Hermitian symmetric spaces
    0 references
    quantization
    0 references
    Berezin transform
    0 references
    canonical representations
    0 references
    tensor products
    0 references
    Berezin kernel
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers