Coherentlike conditions in pullbacks (Q1363624)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Coherentlike conditions in pullbacks
scientific article

    Statements

    Coherentlike conditions in pullbacks (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    6 October 1998
    0 references
    Let \(M\) be a (nonzero) maximal ideal of a domain \(T\), let \(k=T/M\) be the residue field, let \(\varphi: T\to k\) be the natural projection, and let \(D\) be a proper subring of \(k\). Let \(R= \varphi^{-1} (D)\) be the domain arising from the following pullback of canonical homomorphisms: \[ \begin{matrix} R & \to & D \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ T & @>\varphi>> & k & =T/M. \end{matrix} \leqno\square: \] We use \(K\) and \(F\) to denote the quotient fields on \(R\) and \(D\), respectively. The case \(k=F\) is of particular interest; in this case, we say that the diagram \(\square\) is of type \(\square^*\). The goal of this paper is to characterize certain coherentlike properties of integral domains in pullback constructions of type \(\square\). In one sense, this work is a sequel to that of \textit{J. W. Brewer} and \textit{E. A. Rutter} [Mich. Math. J. 23, 33-42 (1976; Zbl 0318.13007)], in which coherence, and several other properties are studied in so-called generalized \(D+M\) constructions. An ideal \(I\) of a domain \(R\) is said to be \(v\)-finite if \(I^{-1}= J^{-1}\) for some finitely generated ideal \(J\) of \(R\). We denote section 2 to a study of divisoriality and \(v\)-finiteness in pullbacks of type \(\square\). We then give a complete characterization of when \(M\) is \(v\)-finite as an ideal of \(R\). A domain \(R\) is said to be \(v\)-coherent if \(I^{-1}\) is a \(v\)-finite divisorial ideal for each finitely generated ideal \(I\) of \(R\). Section 3 begins with a brief review of known facts, most of which are contained in the thesis of \textit{D. Nour el Abidine} [``Groupe des classes de certains anneaux intègres et idéaux transformés'' (Lyon 1992)]. We then proceed to characterize when \(R\) is \(v\)-coherent. In section 4, we use results and techniques from sections 2 and 3 to characterize several other coherentlike conditions in pullbacks of type \(\square\), e.g.: \(R\) is coherent (quasicoherent, a finite conductor domain) if and only if exactly one of the following conditions holds: (1) \(k\) is the quotient field of \(D\), \(D\) and \(T\) are coherent (quasicoherent, finite conductor domains), and \(T_M\) is a valuation domain; or (2) \(D\) is a field, \([k:D] <\infty\), \(T\) is coherent (quasicoherent, a finite conductor domain), and \(M\) is finitely generated in \(T\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    \(v\)-coherent domain
    0 references
    \(D+M\) constructions
    0 references
    \(v\)-finite ideal \(I\)
    0 references
    going down
    0 references
    pullback
    0 references
    coherence
    0 references
    0 references