Algebraically constructible functions and signs of polynomials (Q1365303)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Algebraically constructible functions and signs of polynomials
scientific article

    Statements

    Algebraically constructible functions and signs of polynomials (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 June 1999
    0 references
    The general context, the paper deals with, is the following: Let be given real algebraic sets \(W\) and \(X\subset W\times \mathbb{R}^n\) satisfying the condition \(W\times \{0\} \subset X\). The real algebraic set \(X\) may be given by a polynomial function \(F:W\times \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}^m\) as \(X=F^{-1} (0)\). For \(w\in W\) let us write \(X_w:= \{y\in \mathbb{R}^n; (w;y) \in X\}\) and \(F_w:\mathbb{R}^n \to\mathbb{R}^m\) for the polynomial function defined by \(F_w(y): =F(w;y)\), where \(y\) is any point of \(\mathbb{R}^n\). Thus \((X_w)_{w\in W}\) and \((F_w)_{w\in W}\) are by the real algebraic variety \(W\) parametrized families of real algebraic sets and polynomial functions. The paper addresses particular aspects of the following general problem: What can be said about the families \((X_w)_{w\in W}\) and \((F_w)_{w\in W}\) in terms of the (abstract) parameter variety \(W\) only? What are the ``invariant'' properties of these objects? The paper gives the following answers to these questions: Let \(m=n\). Suppose that for any \(w\in W\) the point \(0\in \mathbb{R}^n\) is isolated in \(F_w^{-1}(0)\). For \(w\in W\) denote by \(\deg_0F_w\) the topological degree of \(F_w\) in the point \(0\in \mathbb{R}^n\). Then there exist polynomial functions \(g_1, \dots, g_s\) defined on the real algebraic variety \(W\), such that for any \(w\in W\) the identity \(\deg_0 F_w= \text{sign} g_1(w) +\cdots +\text{sign} g_s(w)\) holds (theorem 3.4). For any point \(w\in W\) let us denote by \(\chi (X_\omega)\) the Euler characteristic of \(X_w\). Then there are polynomial functions \(g_1, \dots, g_s\), defined on the real algebraic variety \(W\), such that \(\chi (X_w)=\text{sign} g_1 (w)+ \dots+\text{sign} g_s(w)\) holds for any \(w\in W\). - In particular, if \(W\) is irreducible, there exist a proper real algebraic subset \(\Sigma \subset W\), an integer \(\mu\) and a polynomial function \(g:W\to \mathbb{R}\), with \(g\) nowhere vanishing on \(W \setminus\Sigma\), such that for any point \(w\in W\setminus \Sigma\) the congruence relations \(\chi (X_w) \equiv \mu+ \text{sign} g(w) \pmod 4\) and \(\chi (X_w) \equiv \mu+1 \pmod 2\) hold (theorem 5.3). These results are applied to algebraically constructible functions define on the real algebraic variety \(W\) (i.e. to functions \(\varphi: W\to \mathbb{Z}\) which admit a presentation as a finite sum \(\varphi= \sum_{1\leq i\leq t} m_if_i* \mathbf{1}_{Z_i}\) where, for any \(1\leq i\leq t\), \(Z_i\) is a real algebraic set which characteristic function \(\mathbf{1}_{Z_i}\) is a proper regular morphism, \(f_i* \mathbf{1}_{Z_i}: =\int_{Z_i} f_i\) and \(m_1, \dots, m_t\) are integers. - In this context, the authors show the following results: A given integer valued function \(\varphi: W\to \mathbb{Z}\) is algebraically constructible if and only if there exist polynomial functions \(g_1, \dots, g_s:W\to \mathbb{R}\) such that for any point \(w\in W\), the identity \(\varphi (w)= \text{sign} g_1(w) +\cdots +\text{sign} g_s (w)\) holds (theorem 6.1). Let \(m=n\). Assume that for any \(w\in W\) the point \(0\in \mathbb{R}^n\) is isolated in \(F_w^{-1} (0)\). Then, the map which assigns to any point \(w\in W\) the value \(\deg_0F_w\) is algebraically constructible. -- Moreover, the function which assigns to any point \(w\in W\) the value \(\chi(X_w)\) is algebraically constructible (corollary 6.2). Assume that the real algebraic set \(W\) is irreducible. Let \(\varphi: W\to \mathbb{Z}\) be an algebraic constructible function. Then there exist a proper real algebraic subset \(\Sigma \subset W\), an integer \(\mu\) and a polynomial function \(g:W\to \mathbb{R}\), nowhere vanishing on \(W \smallsetminus \Sigma\), such that the congruence relations \(\varphi(w) \equiv\mu +\text{sign} g(w) \pmod 4\) and \(\varphi(w) \equiv \mu+1 \pmod 2\) hold (corollary 6.3). Let \(\varphi: W\to \mathbb{Z}\) be an algebraically constructible function. For \(w\in W\) let \(\Lambda \varphi (w): =\int_{S_{(w, \varepsilon)}}\varphi\), where \(S_{(w, \varepsilon)}\) is the \(\varepsilon\)-sphere centered at the point \(w\) for sufficient small \(\varepsilon>0\). Let \(D\varphi: =\varphi -\Lambda \varphi\). Then \(1\over 2\Lambda \varphi\) is integer valued and algebraically constructible (theorem 6.4).
    0 references
    0 references
    topology of real algebraic varieties
    0 references
    families of real algebraic sets
    0 references
    algebraically constructible functions
    0 references

    Identifiers