Suitability of yield functions for the approximation of subsequent yield surfaces (Q1369812)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1077130
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Suitability of yield functions for the approximation of subsequent yield surfaces
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1077130

      Statements

      Suitability of yield functions for the approximation of subsequent yield surfaces (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      19 October 1998
      0 references
      Many constitutive models in the plasticity of metals are based on the existence of a yield function, which is not only used to mark the elastic limit but also as a potential function for the plastic strain rate. Measurements of elastic limits show how the geometry of the yield function contour lines should change with further straining. Existing proposals for invariant formulations of the yield function which take into account isotropic, kinematic and formative hardening are tested against typical geometric forms of the yield surfaces. Even if no evaluation equations are specified for constitutive variables contained in the yield functions, best approximations of measured yield surfaces can be computed by optimization of a quality function. Here the authors demonstrate that most of representations of the yield function are not able to describe experimental results qualitatively. The numerical results show that yield functions are essentially of grade three in the deviatoric stresses. Nevertheless, the evolution of internal variables can be deduced adequately from approximations based on the corresponding measurements.
      0 references
      associated flow rule
      0 references
      elastic limit
      0 references
      constitutive variables
      0 references
      optimization
      0 references
      quality function
      0 references

      Identifiers