Random forcing and (S) and (L). (Q1398196)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Random forcing and (S) and (L).
scientific article

    Statements

    Random forcing and (S) and (L). (English)
    0 references
    29 July 2003
    0 references
    The author gives some conditions for two propositions (S) and (L) to be true or not. (S): Every hereditarily separable space is hereditarily Lindelöf and (L): Every hereditarily Lindelöf space is hereditarily separable. Under \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\), after forcing with a separable measure algebra, (S) and (L) are true in the class of cometrizable spaces. A measure is finitely additive, the unit interval \([0,1]\)-valued and strictly positive. For a nonseparable measure algebra, there are counterexamples to (S) and (L). If there is a Sierpiński set, then there is a compact space which contains a counterexample to (L). The Wage lemma \(W(\theta)\) holds after focing with any measure algebra. Under the existence of a Sierpiński set, there is a compact space which contains a counterexample to (L). There are two questions, both under \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\). After forcing with any measure algebra, does \(X^2\) contain uncountable discrete subsets whenever \(X\) is nonmetrizable and compact? Another one is: After forcing with any measure algebra, does (S) hold for first countable compact spaces?
    0 references
    0 references
    \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\)
    0 references
    homogeneous measure algebra
    0 references
    random forcing
    0 references
    Lindelöf
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers