Random forcing and (S) and (L). (Q1398196)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1955990
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Random forcing and (S) and (L).
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1955990

      Statements

      Random forcing and (S) and (L). (English)
      0 references
      29 July 2003
      0 references
      The author gives some conditions for two propositions (S) and (L) to be true or not. (S): Every hereditarily separable space is hereditarily Lindelöf and (L): Every hereditarily Lindelöf space is hereditarily separable. Under \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\), after forcing with a separable measure algebra, (S) and (L) are true in the class of cometrizable spaces. A measure is finitely additive, the unit interval \([0,1]\)-valued and strictly positive. For a nonseparable measure algebra, there are counterexamples to (S) and (L). If there is a Sierpiński set, then there is a compact space which contains a counterexample to (L). The Wage lemma \(W(\theta)\) holds after focing with any measure algebra. Under the existence of a Sierpiński set, there is a compact space which contains a counterexample to (L). There are two questions, both under \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\). After forcing with any measure algebra, does \(X^2\) contain uncountable discrete subsets whenever \(X\) is nonmetrizable and compact? Another one is: After forcing with any measure algebra, does (S) hold for first countable compact spaces?
      0 references
      0 references
      \({\mathfrak M}{\mathfrak A}_{\aleph_1}\)
      0 references
      homogeneous measure algebra
      0 references
      random forcing
      0 references
      Lindelöf
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers