An umbilical point on a non-real-analytic surface (Q1409321)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1991027
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    An umbilical point on a non-real-analytic surface
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1991027

      Statements

      An umbilical point on a non-real-analytic surface (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      13 October 2003
      0 references
      The index of an isolated umbilical point on a surface in three-dimensional Euclidean space is studied. The main attention is paid to the following index conjecture: the index of an isolated umbilical point is not more than one. This conjecture is motivated by studying constant mean curvature surfaces whose isolated umbilical points are always of negative index. Moreover, it is proved by the author in [\textit{N. Ando}, Tohoku Math. J., II. Ser. 54, No. 2, 163--177 (2002; Zbl 1022.53006)] that if the point (0,0,0) is an isolated umbilical point on the graph \(z=g(x,y)\) of a homogeneous polynomial of degree \(k\) then its index is an element of \(\{ 1-k/2, 2-k/2,\dots, 1+[k/2]-k/2 \}\). Similar analysis is produced for the graph of an arbitrary analytic function. The present paper is devoted to the study of smooth non-zero functions with zero coefficients of all orders in Taylor's expansion like \(\exp(-1/(x^2+y^2))\). The author starts from a smooth function \(F(x,y)\) defined in a neighborhood of \((0,0)\) in such a way that all coefficients of order less than \(l\) in Taylor's expansion vanish at \((0,0)\). It is also supposed that \(F(x,y)\) is positive in a punctured neighborhood of \((0,0)\) and that for each \(c>0\) there exists a punctured neighborhood of \((0,0)\) on which \(| \operatorname{grad} F | / F > c\) holds. Then it is proven that \((0,0)\) is an isolated umbilical point with index 1 on the graph of \(E_n (aF(x,y))\) for any natural \(n\) and positive real \(a\). Here \(E_0(b)=b\), \(E_1(b)= \exp(-1/b)\), and \(E_k(b)=E_1(E_{k-1}(b))\) is defined for each \(k\) inductively. Some particular examples are analyzed, a subtler version of the formulated statement is also proven.
      0 references
      umbilical point
      0 references
      principal distribution
      0 references
      index of an umbilical point
      0 references

      Identifiers