Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation (Q1573006)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Publication:1573006 |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1484953
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1484953 |
Statements
Anatomy of coupled constitutive models for ratcheting simulation (English)
0 references
6 August 2000
0 references
This paper critically evaluates the performance of five constitutive models in predicting ratcheting responses of carbon steel for a broad set of uniaxial and biaxial loading histories. Namely, the models proposed by Prager, Armstrong and Frederick, Chaboche, Ohno-Wang and Guionnet are examined, and reasons are given for success and failure in simulating ratcheting by using these models. The bilinear Prager and nonlinear Armstrong-Frederick models are found to be inadequate in simulating ratcheting responses. The Chaboche and Ohno-Wang models perform quite well in pedicting uniaxial ratcheting responses; however, they overpredict systematically the biaxial ratcheting response. The Guionnet model simulates very well a set of biaxial ratcheting responses, but fails to simulate uniaxial and other biaxial ratcheting responses.
0 references
Prager model
0 references
Armstrong-Frederick model
0 references
Chaboche model
0 references
Ohno-Wang model
0 references
cyclic plasticity
0 references
uniaxial ratcheting
0 references
Guionnet model
0 references
biaxial ratcheting
0 references
0.8653779625892639
0 references
0.8381145000457764
0 references
0.8237898945808411
0 references
0.81963050365448
0 references
0.8141759037971497
0 references