Extreme points and support points of subordination families (Q1589954)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Extreme points and support points of subordination families
scientific article

    Statements

    Extreme points and support points of subordination families (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 May 2001
    0 references
    The family \(A\) of analytic functions \(f\) of the unit disk \(\Delta\), equipped with the topology of uniform convergence in compact subsets forms a locally convex linear space. Let \(B_0:=\{\omega\in A |\omega(0)=0, |\omega|<1\}\). A function \(f\in A\) is called \textit{subordinate} to \(g\), denoted by \(f\prec g\), if there exists a function \(\omega\in B_0\) such that \(f=g\circ \omega\). If \(g\) is univalent, this is equivalent to the normalization \(f(0)=g(0)\) and the geometric property \(f(\Delta)\subset g(\Delta)\). The family \(s(F):=\{f\in A |f\prec F\}\) is called a subordination family. The given article surveys known results for subordination families. Special cases are \(B_0=s(z)\) and \[ P:=\{p\in A |\text{ Re} p(z)>0\}=\{p\in A |p\prec {1+z \over 1-z}\} =s({1+z \over 1-z}) . \] The Krein-Milman theorem guarantees that a subordination family has \textit{extreme points} \(\text{ E} s(F)\neq \emptyset\), and these reconstruct \(s(F)\), i.~e. \(\overline{\text{ co}} \text{ E} s(F)=\overline{\text{ co}} s(F)\), \(\overline{\text{ co}} M\) denoting the closed convex hull of \(M\). The Herglotz representation formula shows via Choquet's theorem that \[ \text{ E} P=\{{1+xz \over 1-xz} ||x|=1\}. \] It is easy to see that in subordination families for every extreme point \(f\in \text{ E} s(F)\) (or \(f\in \text{ E} \overline{\text{ co}} s(F)\)), and \(f\prec g\), it follows that also \(g\in \text{ E} s(F)\) (or \(g\in \text{ E} \overline{\text{ co}} s(F)\), respectively) [W. Koepf: Extrempunkte und Stützpunkte in Familien nicht-verschwindender analytischer Funktionen; \(PhD\) thesis, Free University Berlin (1984)]. Hence the extreme points are large with respect to \(\prec\). A similar statement holds for the \textit{support points} of a linear functional \(L\). In the case of \(P\), the set of extreme points is smallest possible and consists only of the maximal elements w.~r.~t.\ \(\prec\). The authors show under which conditions for \(F\) this situation occurs. In contrast, for \(B_0\) one has \[ \text{ E} B_0= \{f\in B_0 |\int_0^{2\pi} \log (1-|f(e^{it})|) dt=-\infty\} \] Hence in this case, the set of extreme points is rather large. The article informs about the situation for general \(F\) which lies between the two extremes. Furthermore the set of support points of subordination families is considered. Finally, extreme point results for functions subordinate to convex, starlike and close-to-convex functions are given. Similar results for functions normalized by \(f(0)=1\) and \(f\neq 0\) can be found in [Complex Variables, Theory Appl. 8, 153-171 (1987; Zbl 0622.30002)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Krein-Milman theorem
    0 references
    Herglotz representation formula
    0 references
    Choquet theorem
    0 references
    closed convex hull
    0 references
    univalent functions
    0 references
    convex functions
    0 references
    starlike functions
    0 references
    close-to-convex functions
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references